Chevrolet Malibu 0-60 Times
These are the latest Chevrolet Malibu 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times taken from reputable car magazine sources such as Car and Driver, MotorTrend and Road & Track. There are many reasons why 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times can vary including the driver, weather conditions, wear and tear on the vehicle during test, and more. By giving you a list of all Chevrolet Malibu 0-60 times and quarter mile times, you can get a general idea of what performance numbers are achievable with Chevrolet Malibu for all model years available in our database.
Trim | Engine | Drive Type | Trans. | 0-60 | 1/4 Mile | Mpg EPA C/H/Observed | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
RS | 1.5L Turbo I-4 | FWD | CVT | 7.8 sec | 16.1 sec @ 87 mph | 29/36/25 mpg | Car and Driver |
2018 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
LT Redline Edition | 1.5L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 6A | 8.2 sec | 16.4 sec @ 85 mph | 27/36/23 mpg | Car and Driver |
2017 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
2.0T Premier | 2.0L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 9A | 5.7 sec | 14.3 sec @ 99.4 mph | 22/33/27.8 mpg | Motor Trend |
2016 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
1LT | 15L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 6A | 8.0 sec | 16.4 sec @ 85 mph | 27/37/23 mpg | Car and Driver |
1LT | 1.5L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 6A | 8.5 sec | 16.5 sec @ 84.6 mph | 27/37/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
2.0T Premier | 2.0L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 8A | 6.1 sec | 14.7 sec @ 97 mph | 22/33/20 mpg | Car and Driver |
2.0T Premier | 2.0L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 8A | 6.2 sec | 14.7 sec @ 96.2 mph | 22/33/26 mpg | Motor Trend |
Hybrid | 1.8L I-4 + Elec 1.5-kWh | FWD | CVT | 7.4 sec | 15.7 sec @ 90 mph | 47/46/35 mpg | Car and Driver |
Hybrid | 1.8L I-4 + Elec 1.5-kWh | FWD | CVT | 7.4 sec | 15.8 sec @ 88.5 mph | 47/46/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
2015 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
2LTZ 2.0 Turbo | 2.0L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 6A | 6.3 sec | 14.9 sec @ 94.3 mph | 21/30/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
2014 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
1LT | 2.5L I-4 | FWD | 6A | 8.4 sec | 16.4 sec @ 86.7 mph | 25/36/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
2LT | 2.5L I-4 | FWD | 6A | 7.9 sec | 16.2 sec @ 88 mph | 25/36/20 mpg | Car and Driver |
2LTZ 2.0 Turbo | 2.0L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 6A | 6.2 sec | 14.8 sec @ 97 mph | 21/30/23 mpg | Car and Driver |
2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
1LTZ | 2.5L I-4 | FWD | 6A | 7.7 sec | 16.1 sec @ 88 mph | 22/34/17 mpg | Car and Driver |
1LTZ | 2.5L I-4 | FWD | 6A | 8.4 sec | 16.5 sec @ 85.3 mph | 22/34/21.3 mpg | Motor Trend |
2LTZ 2.0 Turbo | 2.0L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 6A | 6.3 sec | 15.0 sec @ 95 mph | 21/30/23 mpg | Car and Driver |
2LTZ 2.0 Turbo | 2.0L Turbo I-4 | FWD | 6A | 6.8 sec | 15.4 sec @ 95 mph | 21/30/22.4 mpg | Motor Week |
Hybrid Eco Premium | 2.4L I-4 + Elec 15-kW | FWD | 6A | 8.1 sec | 16.3 sec @ 86 mph | 25/37/26 mpg | Car and Driver |
Hybrid Eco Premium | 2.4L I-4 + Elec 15-kW | FWD | 6A | 8.5 sec | 16.6 sec @ 83.8 mph | 25/37/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
Hybrid Eco Premium | 2.4L I-4 + Elec 15-kW | FWD | 6A | 8.4 sec | 16.6 sec @ 84 mph | 25/37/33.1 mpg | Motor Week |
2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
2LT | 2.4L I-4 | FWD | 6A | 9.0 sec | 16.8 sec @ 84.1 mph | 22/33/22.5 mpg | Motor Trend |
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
Hybrid | 2.4L I-4 + Elec 10-kW | FWD | 4A | 9.2 sec | 17.1 sec @ 84 mph | 26/34/29 mpg | Car and Driver |
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
1LT | 2.4L I-4 | FWD | 4A | 8.7 sec | 16.7 sec @ 83 mph | 22/30/24 mpg | Car and Driver |
1LT | 2.4L I-4 | FWD | 4A | 9.3 sec | 17.1 sec @ 82 mph | 22/30/22 mpg | Car and Driver |
2LT V6 | 3.6L V6 | FWD | 6A | 7.1 sec | 15.6 sec @ 95 mph | 17/26/20.9 mpg | Motor Week |
Hybrid | 2.4L I-4 + Elec | FWD | 4A | 8.8 sec | 16.8 sec @ 84 mph | 24/32/25 mpg | Car and Driver |
LTZ | 2.4L I-4 | FWD | 6A | 8.6 sec | 16.7 sec @ 84 mph | 22/32/---- mpg | Car and Driver |
LTZ | 2.4L I-4 | FWD | 6A | 8.8 sec | 16.7 sec @ 84.3 mph | 22/32/21.5 mpg | Motor Trend |
LTZ V6 | 3.6L V6 | FWD | 6A | 6.5 sec | 15.1 sec @ 94 mph | 17/26/21 mpg | Car and Driver |
LTZ V6 | 3.6L V6 | FWD | 6A | 6.4 sec | 15.0 sec @ 93.8 mph | 17/26/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
LTZ V6 | 3.6L V6 | FWD | 6A | 6.5 sec | 15.1 sec @ 93.7 mph | 17/26/16.3 mpg | Motor Trend |
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
Maxx SS V6 | 3.9L V6 | FWD | 4A | 6.9 sec | 15.3 sec @ 91 mph | 16/24/18 mpg | Car and Driver |
SS V6 | 3.9L V6 | FWD | 4A | 7.0 sec | 15.3 sec @ 91 mph | 17/24/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
Maxx LT V6 | 3.5L V6 | FWD | 4A | 8.3 sec | 16.0 sec @ 85.7 mph | 20/28/23.1 mpg | Motor Trend |
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
LT V6 | 3.5L V6 | FWD | 4A | 7.9 sec | 16.1 sec @ 88 mph | 20/29/24 mpg | Car and Driver |
LT V6 | 3.5L V6 | FWD | 4A | 7.8 sec | 15.64 sec @ 89.11 mph | 20/29/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
LT V6 | 3.5L V6 | FWD | 4A | 8.0 sec | 16.1 sec @ 89 mph | 20/29/24 mpg | Motor Week |
Maxx LT V6 | 3.5L V6 | FWD | 4A | 7.8 sec | 16.1 sec @ 86 mph | 19/28/24 mpg | Car and Driver |
Maxx LT V6 | 3.5L V6 | FWD | 4A | 8.3 sec | 16.02 sec @ 86 mph | 19/28/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
Maxx LT V6 | 3.5L V6 | FWD | 4A | 8.1 sec | 16.3 sec @ 85 mph | 19/28/26 mpg | Motor Week |
1998 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
Sport (Prototype) | 3.4L V6 | FWD | 5M | 5.9 sec | 14.6 sec @ 95.3 mph | ----/----/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
1997 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
LS V6 | 3.1L V6 | FWD | 4A | 8.2 sec | 16.2 sec @ 85 mph | 18/26/21.9 mpg | Motor Trend |
LS V6 | 3.1L V6 | FWD | 4A | 9.0 sec | 16.6 sec @ 83.7 mph | 18/26/---- mpg | Motor Trend |
LS V6 | 3.1L V6 | FWD | 4A | 8.3 sec | 16.4 sec @ 84 mph | 18/26/---- mpg | Motor Week |
1978 Chevrolet Malibu | |||||||
Classic Landau Coupe | 5.0L V8 | RWD | 4M | 10.8 sec | 18.4 sec @ 76.2 mph | ----/----/---- mpg | Car and Driver |

ricardo morrallis
May 28, 2015 at 8:23 am
So I was looking for the 0-60 times and thats how i get to this page. In comparing the cars in this segment the only quicker car is the nissan altima with the v-6 power plant. These reviews sound like a cliff note of the car and driver review and thats seems to be the case across the net. My father-in law has the turbo fusion 2014, the malibu 2.0 turbo while lacking the steering feel of the fusion, will stomp all over the for on the interstate , up top down low any part of the power band in any situation like merging the Bu wipes the ford down. I drove an 2015 ATS with the 2.0 T mill, and it handled very well and was rapid, minus the handeling the rwd ATS has, I feel like this MILL in fwd spec shows its teeth much quicker maybe less rotaing mass just a feeling. If your a chevy person or your tired of your overweight aunt telling you ‘ oh get a honda, there the best, i still love my 1992 accord its so reliable , ugh get honda’ yeah well 259 hp. @295 lbs is stout. Personally i dont own racing shoes nor do i have leather driving gloves,my car hauls the mail down U.S. Interstate, and really if you own a fusion and brag about the feel it has in time trials geaux you, note: no,one drives their mid sized family hauler on a track stop making that the watermark for reviews, auto journalist get a life.