Ford Mustang 0-60 Times

5 Comments

1. 

   Wayne Rhodes

   September 19, 2015 at 6:34 am

   I have owned the 15 GT and now own the 15 eco-boost, The GT got hit while parked in front of my home out on the curb like 3 or more dozen cars are parked. An elderly man hit my parked 15 GT in the rear and waded that car up like smashing a coke can. He had All-State insurance that paid off my 2 week old car and gave me back $24,779.00 out of the $25,000 I had for a down payment. I am happy with my eco-boost 15 mustang.

   Reply
2. 

   Rick

   January 7, 2016 at 4:24 pm

   I can’t understand why they recommend not looking at the V6 model, and get the Ecoboost when the specifications that they posted above clearly indicate that the V6 is quicker in both 0 to 60, and through the 1/4 Mile.

   Reply
   • 

     Arless Rhodes

     March 30, 2016 at 11:19 am

     I’d take the v-6 now after owning the eco-boost that I traded in for a 2016 GT. Couldn’t locate a v-6 in 2015 or another replacement for my totaled 15 GT so hence why I bought the eco-boost in the first place. After 900 miles went by my favorite salesman gave me a call said the 16 models had arrived. so I gathered up all the car eco-boost paper work went in and ordered a 2016 GT the way I wanted it to be. Black paint pony package 3.55 rear sets automatic transmission. $35,990 out the door. Added a SCT tune and Airaid cold air intake. she ran a all time best of 0-30 2.2 sec. 0-60 4.5 0-100 in 9.2 seconds 60ft. 1.8 seconds 330ft. in 5.1 seconds 1/8 mile 8.1 @ 93 mph, 1000ft @ 10.4 @ 107 mph & 1/4th mile in 12.467 @ 116 mph

     Reply
3. 

   Arless Rhodes

   March 30, 2016 at 1:17 pm

   I now own a 2016 shadow black pony package Mustang GT 3.55 rear sets and automatic trans so I can finger my girl while driving to the park to fu-k bone stock she ran all time best of 4.7 to 60 and 12.8 quarter mile at 111 mph with two mods she now runs best 0-30 2.2 seconds shitty traction 0-60 4.4 seconds 60ft. in 1.8 sec’s & 330ft in 5.1 sec’s and 1/8th mile in 8.1 sec’s @ 94 mph and 1/4th mile time of 12.473 @ 117.9 mph I’ve out ran two Camaros with it so far a 2015 Z/28 from a rolling start and a 2016 Camaro SS with the new 8 speed automatic and Cad. chassis also from a rolling start. All season Pirelli 19″X 8.5″ wide all season tires do not stick to the asphalt at all. hence the 2.2 0-30 mph. If I could cut a 1.6 second 0-30 like the 11.5″ wide Z/28 summer tires then I could knock off 6 hundredths second off my ET. or Camaro SS 0-30 in 1.7 seconds knock off 0.5 seconds off my ET. My Automatic GT with 3.55 rear sets just pulled a way from the Camaro SS which has two engine performance levels his was the376.1 cubic inch 455 HP version but they also have a 414 HP version also the SS1 Ran the SS from 65 mph start and just walked a way from him even so he left on the second horn beep just after it sounded. The Z/28 was a hand full we both spun something terrible almost hit each other had to both get off the gas to regain our control. then my stallion hooked up she gradually pulled a head until he’d shift and for an instance he’d come back up on me and fad back till the next gear change by the time I was in fourth gear I happened to look at my tachometer and she was getting ready to hit the rev limiter @ 7250 rpms and I looked back he was right there about two lengths and a half fender when we both let off the gas. He followed me till I pulled in the Shell station for gas. Quote his first lost race since he’s owned his Z/28, you could see his discern in his face as he waved to me on his way out.

   Reply
4. 

   tODD

   December 2, 2016 at 7:44 am

   With the ecoboost Mustangs, replacing the turbo at 100,000 miles must be considered. The 3.7L engine is a far better choice because of FAR BETTER reliability.

   Reply